Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTXBg3AC75kgs9XYvY99ru1QkDJZoS_wyi8XrQFV90U9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead  (Tomasz Ostrowski <tometzky+pg@ato.waw.pl>)
Responses Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead
List pgsql-bugs
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Tomasz Ostrowski
<tometzky+pg@ato.waw.pl> wrote:
> That wouldn't solve my problem, which is that I need a way to disable
> indexes before large update. I believe (but I'm not sure) that Oracle has
> this concept:
>         ALTER INDEX [INDEX_NAME] UNUSABLE;

I think that this must make the index unusable to the optimizer. The
idea being that you can see the impact of dropping the index without
actually doing so, reserving the ability to back out (mark the index
usable once more rather than actually dropping it) if it turns out
that the index is of some use.

If it simply made the index unusable while removing any ongoing
obligation for writes to maintain the index, then what's the point in
supporting this at all? You need to be able to mark it usable again.

--
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tomasz Ostrowski
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead
Next
From: "Rader, David"
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalid indexes should not consume update overhead