Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTJQK0tBEMTqetyOHAe50fnD56S3Lmr=NQRzy2pjF7E+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think you're both wrong.  1000 usec = 1 msec, not the other way round.

Yes, but why would you ever want to divide any number of microseconds
by 1000 like this, unless you were actually interested in nanoseconds?
The point is that we start out with microseconds "elapsed" here, not
milliseconds or seconds.


--
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: log_checkpoints, microseconds