Re: Minor ON CONFLICT related fixes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Minor ON CONFLICT related fixes
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZT1qX+jWg6UUP3-Gp3EuztoFYWchsM2TkJP_WWHoXGFaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minor ON CONFLICT related fixes  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> Here is a cumulative version of what was previously posted.

BTW, this could result in more calls to get_opclass_family() and
get_opclass_input_type() than before. However, because we'll have
eliminated so many candidates (e.g. by seeing that they're not unique
indexes) by the time the call to infer_collation_opclass_match() comes
anyway, and because it's so rare to have to specify an opclass at all,
I thought this was fine.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5 open items
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable