On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> If that is the case, I'd argue that's a glibc problem, not our
> problem. Of course, we could provide an option to disable abbreviated
> keys for the benefit of people who need to work around buggy libc
> implementations.
That would be an easy patch to write. We'd simply have a test within
bttextsortsupport() that had systems that disabled abbreviated keys
for text PG_RETURN_VOID(). Actually, to be more precise we'd put that
next to the Windows code within varstr_sortsupport() (the function is
called btsortsupport_worker in 9.5). It would look at a GUC, I
suppose.
--
Peter Geoghegan
