Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSve1utUde-hsBpwq6MkP438i8fMU=QuAb0D6LWow+KLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> That particular case I believe is using work_mem=4MB, easy strings, 1.5GB table.

Cool. I wonder where this leaves Heikki's draft patch, that completely
removes batch memory, etc.



-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer?
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING option for vacuumdb