Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSvcs-EEKm57o0uxUAmdvDXR=QCP6DPjJ-8Wa_UgbF1Dw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, really, I was just suggesting that I can spend more time on the
>> patch, but not immediately.
>
> We haven't really talked about the idea of the HyperLogLog-based abort
> mechanism - the actual cost model - even though I thought we'd have
> discussed that extensively by now.

My concern is that if we only get it committed in the last commitfest,
we may run out of time to make sortsupport work for B-Tree index
builds. That's where the sortsupport for text stuff will be really
useful.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Promise index tuples for UPSERT
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?