Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSmzvLa6FQD6GrQtG=OCQNN2s=Okzr=02oM3z47b0kxig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> TBH I don't care about torn pages during normal testing. I don't want to
> suggest disabling it for real workloads with real data, just that it's
> important to do so during development/testing of WAL related code,
> because otherwise it will hide/fixup many errors.

Sure, but you might want to account for torn pages anyway.
Particularly if you're interested in some degree of automation, as we
all seem to be.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?