Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZSbZ928nxHMNQMGrY26uBva9oFmxff-nqOa4hH+VKfvoA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 1. Take the specific docs that relate to the patch and put them in one
> place, so that everybody can read and understand and agree the
> behaviour of the patch. So that someone reading that can see *exactly*
> what is being proposed, not read through pages of other unchanged
> material hoping to catch the few points that really differ.

I'm afraid I don't follow. I have links to the user-visible
documentation (v1.3) on the Wiki:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT#Documentation

The documentation is complete. I link to every interesting page from
the documentation directly from the Wiki, too. Of course, I also
describe the issues in more detail for those with an interest in the
implementation on the Wiki page itself (and list open issues). I have
isolation tests that illustrate the new facets of visibility for READ
COMMITTED, too.

How, specifically, have I failed to do what you ask here? If you want
to see exactly what has changed, in a differential fashion, well,
that's what a diff is for. I'm not aware of any existing way of
rendering to html for readability, while highlighting what is new.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb generator functions
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: TODO request: log_long_transaction