On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It seems unlikely to me that recursing into the name lists is helpful
> here: those are not going to contain any data that is interpretable
> without context. Did you have a reason to do that?
I saw no reason to avoid the extra cycles. A noticeable omission has a
cost: it gets noticed. Given this code path is likely to hardly ever
be hit, this mechanical approach seemed best. That's all.
--
Peter Geoghegan
