On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> On the other hand, if we have it as DEBUG2 in the EXEC_BACKEND code
> path, I would be willing to argue that that's too low. If you're
> starting to feel a need to inquire into the backend's behavior, knowing
> about loaded modules seems like one of the first things you need to know
> about. Hence, I'd vote for DEBUG1.
+1 to DEBUG1.
--
Peter Geoghegan
