Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZRc-ZbTc0-P+yUwLHBtpUY9hrYARLzjPmODvrNyFa2ZrA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Fix for OpenSSL error queue bug  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> I'll do so soon. I was waiting on Peter E to take me up on the offer.

Attached is a series of patches for each supported release branch. As
discussed, I would like to target every released version of Postgres
with this bugfix. This is causing users real pain at the moment.

Only the 9.5 backpatch was a simple, conflict-free "git cherry-pick".
Most of the effort here involved producing a clean 9.4 patch. This was
largely mechanical, if a little tricky. In release branches for
releases that preceded 9.4, there were a few further merge conflicts
as I worked backwards through the branches, but those were trivial.

I'm not sure if project policy around backpatching (that commit
messages and so on should match exactly) has anything to say about the
case where backpatching follows several weeks after commit to the
master branch. In the absence of any clear direction on that, I've
created commits that look like what Peter E might have pushed in early
April, had he decided to do that backpatch leg-work up front.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Verifying embedded oids in *recv is a bad idea
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we improve this error message?