False comment about speculative insertion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject False comment about speculative insertion
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZREwGaudXGupgbYtTDNYERHZtP=daqL-dXYY7sVriGXCA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: False comment about speculative insertion  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
Attached patch removes a reference to an executor README section about
speculative insertion. In fact, the high-level overview of speculative
insertion ended up at the top of execIndexing.c. The executor README
was not touched by the ON CONFLICT patch at all.

I don't think it's necessary to refer to execIndexing.c within
ExecInsert instead. All the routines being called from ExecInsert()
that relate to speculative insertion are in execIndexing.c anyway.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Failing assertions in indxpath.c, placeholder.c and brin_minmax.c