Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZQfnDo+R70k-aLkLQsk3LKSzz_LgSCiMFYEyHbyo9CJKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> libc isn't compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (and even if, it uses
> assembly without setup of the frame pointer), so frame pointer based
> call graphs are wrong through libc.  The attributions are based on
> random stuff in the frame pointer at that point.  You either need to use
> dwarf or lbr to get accurate ones.

Is it worth doing that here, and redoing the test, so that the glibc
attributions are correct?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ryan Murphy
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism