Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeevan Chalke
Subject Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext
Date
Msg-id CAM2+6=XBSCcKO55UEns2y99DcK0dHAF8xd60pvuvQ=iB-mLANA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bugfix: incomplete implementation of errhidecontext  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2015-06-08 14:44:53 +0000, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> Implements feature:       tested, passed
> Spec compliant:           tested, passed
> Documentation:            tested, passed
>
> This is trivial bug fix in the area of hiding error context.
>
> I observed that there are two places from which we are calling this function
> to hide the context in log messages. Those were broken.

Broken in which sense? They did prevent stuff to go from the server log?

I'm not convinced that hiding stuff from the client is really
necessarily the same as hiding it from the server log. We e.g. always
send the verbose log to the client, even if we only send the terse
version to the server log.  I don't mind adjusting things for
errhidecontext(), but it's not "just a bug".


Function name itself says that we need to hide the context.
And this I assume it means from all the logs/client etc.

I said it is broken as these two calls are calling this function
with passing TRUE explicitly. But even though I can see the
context messages on the client.

Anyway, I don't want to argue on whether it is a bug or not.

 
Greetings,

Andres Freund


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



--
Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: The Future of Aggregation
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule