Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HOAmUKLwqyVcpsdmdvzmPTb+9vGV=Xdsi8TRcM6hkLAww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements  ("Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov@inbox.ru>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements
List pgsql-hackers
This patch seems to have gotten some feedback but development has
stalled. It's marked "waiting on author" but I'm not clear exactly
what is expected from the authors here. It seems there isn't really
consensus on the design at the moment. There's been no emails in over
a month.

Fwiw I find the idea of having a separate "aux" table kind of awkward.
It'll seem strange to users not familiar with the history and without
any clear idea why the fields are split.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Add psql command to list constraints
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any documentation on how to correctly create extensions in HA(primary-standby) setup?