On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
In any case, the issue looks bigger than just addRangeTableEntry itself. Do you want to write up a patch?
I was going to include it in the overflow patch but I'm now thinking I should make it a separate commit to make sure the change in the contract isn't buried in overflow check changes that are supposed to not change functionality. I'll do that.
