Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData
Date
Msg-id CAM-w4HNFfvGYBUA5R9Nqrvrbc1_2m01t-YYBFX3urTx7Srm73A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
I assume you already considered and rejected having a fixed size null bitmap followed by a variable size array of datums. That seems like it would be denser and work better with cpu cache.

I guess the reason you prefer the struct is because it can be used elsewhere on its own?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Variable-length FunctionCallInfoData