On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> [ shrug... ] They can see whether the Window plan node is where the time
> is going. It's not apparent to me that the extra numbers you propose to
> report will edify anybody.
Perhaps just saying "Incremental Window Function" versus "Iterated
Window Function" or something like that be sufficient? At least that
way query tuning quidelines have a keyword they can say to watch out
for. And someone trying to figure out *why* the time is being spent in
this node has something they might notice a correlation with.
--
greg
