I don't think the benchmarking that's needed is to check whether
pruning unnecessary joins is helpful. Obviously it's going to be hard
to measure on simple queries and small tables. But the resulting plan
is unambiguously superior and in more complex cases could extra i/o.
The benchmarking people were looking for in the past was testing the
impact of the extra planning work in cases where it doesn't end up
being applied. I'm not sure what the worst case is, perhaps a many-way
self-join where the join clauses are not suitable for pruning?
