I have tried to have the above change added in the missing places. Still, I see the below leaks reported by the address sanitizer. Please see the attachments for the leak reported and the function definition updated. Not sure for PQexecPrepared if we call PQclear(res) for cleaning up as well. let me know if you need any more information
Direct leak of 197920 byte(s) in 1237 object(s) allocated from: #0 0xf79bc00b in __interceptor_malloc (/nix/store/7z4l4r0kpgzvsi6zkjz52cvgb8ra06bd-gcc-12.2.0-lib/lib/libasan.so.8+0xbe00b) #1 0xf78b63f3 in PQmakeEmptyPGresult (/nix/store/y03rfw0iycp00dxcf8vrmss4nj700fia-postgresql-14.9-lib/lib/libpq.so.5+0x113f3)
Indirect leak of 2531328 byte(s) in 1236 object(s) allocated from: #0 0xf79bc00b in __interceptor_malloc (/nix/store/7z4l4r0kpgzvsi6zkjz52cvgb8ra06bd-gcc-12.2.0-lib/lib/libasan.so.8+0xbe00b) #1 0xf78b604c in pqResultAlloc (/nix/store/y03rfw0iycp00dxcf8vrmss4nj700fia-postgresql-14.9-lib/lib/libpq.so.5+0x1104c)
Indirect leak of 632832 byte(s) in 1236 object(s) allocated from: #0 0xf79bc00b in __interceptor_malloc (/nix/store/7z4l4r0kpgzvsi6zkjz52cvgb8ra06bd-gcc-12.2.0-lib/lib/libasan.so.8+0xbe00b) #1 0xf78b57e0 in pqAddTuple (/nix/store/y03rfw0iycp00dxcf8vrmss4nj700fia-postgresql-14.9-lib/lib/libpq.so.5+0x107e0)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 3362080 byte(s) leaked in 3709 allocation(s).
I am trying to test a code which basically tries to read some data from postgresql db in a loop through a function SQL_get_tpf_rw() whose definition and other details are shared in the attached file along with the memory leak report resulted during testing. Could you let me know if i missed calling anywhere PQclear()
in SQL_get_tpf_rw() which resulted in the below .
Last few lines from the report
yep: for example,
if (PQresultStatus(res) != PGRES_TUPLES_OK) { LOG_ERROR("SELECT failed: %s", PQerrorMessage(conn)); LOG_DEBUG("ROLLBACK TRANSACTION AND CHAIN"); res = PQexec(conn,"ROLLBACK TRANSACTION AND CHAIN"); LOG_ERROR("INVALID_FILE_ADDRESS %08X",fa); rc = ERR_INVALID_FILE_ADDRESS;
See highlighted bits. You're reusing the res object before clearing it. there may be other cases, but this jumped off the page.
