Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shubham Barai
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)
Date
Msg-id CALxAEPuv2fRvEZMCNp1ZktMePMS2K-wOr3FgYoaqEzb_nWvPMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi.

I am attaching a patch for predicate locking in SP-Gist index


Regards,
Shubham



Sent with Mailtrack

On 26 July 2017 at 20:50, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree

Hi,

During this week, I worked on predicate locking in spgist index. I think, for spgist index, predicate lock only on leaf pages will be enough as spgist searches can determine if there is a match or not only at leaf level.

I have done following things in this week.

1) read the source code of spgist index to understand  the access method

2) found appropriate places to insert calls to existing functions

3) created tests (to verify serialization failures and to demonstrate the feature of reduced false positives) for 'point' and 'box' data types.
    

I will attach the patch shortly.


Regards,
Shubham



Sent with Mailtrack

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call