At the not inconsiderable risk of bike-shedding....
I'm wondering if printing something like 0.00 will be somewhat deceptive when the real value is non-zero but less than 1 row per 200 loops. I wonder if the number of decimal places should be calculated to produce a minimum of one non-zero digit for non-zero values.
-- greg
+ -> Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 (actual rows=1960.00
I have added a new check to remove any ".00" from the output because in
the case of parallel queries we are getting that. Secondly, it is disturbing many test case outputs.
