Re: pgjdbc-ng - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: pgjdbc-ng
Date
Msg-id CALt0+o8DGNFRBFiTkZmcCD0TG32_bGLCOG44J0zNo856RycD9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgjdbc-ng  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: pgjdbc-ng
List pgsql-jdbc
Hi Heikki,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> That should be easy to fix. Looking at PGtype, where the query is coming
> from, all you need to do is add another version of the query without the
> reference to pg_range. The logic for sending a different version of the
> query depending on the server version is already there.

I haven't taken a look at the code because IIRC they didn't want to
bloat the driver with support for old versions.

From my point of view, 9.1 would be the perfect starting point as it's
still widely in production and it will probably stay that way for a
while. But there may be good reasons to not support it.

If support for 9.1 is something they are interested in, we can take a
look at it. Just ping me.

--
Guillaume


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Adib Saikali
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC Maven Checksum
Next
From: Kevin Wooten
Date:
Subject: Re: pgjdbc-ng