Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From dinesh kumar
Subject Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message
Date
Msg-id CALnrH7rE1yuYLv2AMAcTnqs0wG_FCy_eakyFB-j-E7kgzZyOhw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
On 10/22/15 2:20 AM, dinesh kumar wrote:

2. Using this function, if we provide any "NULL" argument to the function,
  we should either skip it or report it. I see this is what the function
is doing.

postgres=# SELECT pg_report_log('INFO', 'NULL', false, NULL, NULL);
INFO:  NULL

postgres=# SELECT pg_report_log('INFO', 'NULL', false, 'NULL', 'NULL');
INFO:  NULL
DETAIL:  NULL /-- Are you suggesting to change this behaviour/
HINT:  NULL

It should operate the same as what was decided for RAISE.

I'd say it should also support the remaining RAISE options as well (COLUMN, CONSTRAINT, DATATYPE, TABLE, SCHEMA).

I think hide_statement is a better name than ishidestmt. It would be nice if RAISE supported that too...

I think the function should also allow specifying a condition name instead of a SQL state, same as RAISE does.

In other words, this function and raise should operate exactly the same unless there's a really strong reason not to. Otherwise it's just going to create confusion.


Thanks Jim,

That make sense to me. Let me cover these options too, and will update here.
 
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_recvlogical fixes
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query