On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:13 PM Hou, Zhijie <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > IMO, let's not change the 1) behaviour to 3) with the patch. If agreed,
>
> > I can do the following way in ExplainOneUtility and will add a comment on
>
> > why we are doing this.
>
> > if (es->analyze)
>
> > (void) CheckRelExistenceInCTAS(ctas, true);
>
> > Thoughts?
>
> Agreed.
Thanks!
So, I will post an updated patch soon.
> Just in case, I took a look at Oracle 12’s behavior about [explain CTAS].
>
> Oracle 12 will output the plan without throwing any msg in this case.
I'm not quite sure how other databases behave. If I go by the main
intention of EXPLAIN without ANALYZE, that should do the planning,
show it in the output and no execution of the query should happen. For
EXPLAIN CTAS/CMV, only thing that gets planned is the SELECT part and
no execution happens so no existence check for the CTAS/CMV relation
that will get created if the CTAS/CMV is executed. Having said that,
the existence of the relations that are in the SELECT part are anyways
checked during planning for EXPLAIN without ANALYZE.
IMHO, let's not alter the existing behaviour, if needed, that can be
discussed separately.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
