On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:17 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 4:25 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [v8]
>
> Okay, I think it's basically in good shape. Since it should be a bit
> faster than a couple versions ago, would you be up for retesting with
> the original test having 8 to 512 writers? And also add the const
> markers we discussed upthread? Aside from that, I plan to commit this
> week unless there is further bikeshedding.
I quickly reviewed v8 patch set, few comments:
1) pg_lfind32 - why just uint32? If it's not possible to define
functions for char, unsigned char, int16, uint16, int32, int64, uint64
and so on, can we add a few comments around that? Also, the comments
can talk about if the base type or element data type of array or data
type of key matters to use pg_lfind32.
2) I think this is not just for the remaining elements but also for
non-USE_SSE2 cases. Also, please specify in which cases we reach here
for USE_SSE2 cases.
+ /* Process the remaining elements the slow way. */
3) Can pg_lfind32 return the index of the key found, for instance to
use it for setting/resetting the found element in the array?
+ * pg_lfind32
+ *
+ * Returns true if there is an element in 'base' that equals 'key'. Otherwise,
+ * returns false.
+ */
+static inline bool
+pg_lfind32(uint32 key, uint32 *base, uint32 nelem)
4) Can we, right away, use this API to replace linear search, say, in
SimpleLruReadPage_ReadOnly(), ATExecAttachPartitionIdx(),
AfterTriggerSetState()? I'm sure I might be missing other places, but
can we replace the possible found areas with the new function?
--
Bharath Rupireddy
RDS Open Source Databases: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/postgresql/
