On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 4:28 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> I had written in [0] about my questions related to using this with
> connection poolers. I don't think this was addressed at all. I haven't
> seen any discussion about how to make this kind of facility usable in a
> full system. You have to manually query and send LSNs; that seems
> pretty cumbersome. Sure, this is part of something that could be
> useful, but how would an actual user with actual application code get to
> use this?
>
> [0]:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8b5b172f-0ae7-d644-8358-e2851dded43b%40enterprisedb.com
I share the same concern as yours and had proposed something upthread
[1]. The idea is something like how each query takes a snapshot at the
beginning of txn/query (depending on isolation level), the same way
the standby can wait for the primary's current LSN as of the moment
(at the time of taking snapshot). And, primary keeps sending its
current LSN as part of regular WAL to standbys so that the standbys
doesn't have to make connections to the primary to know its current
LSN every time. Perhps, this may not even fully guarantee (considered
to be achieving) the read-after-write consistency on standbys unless
there's a way for the application to tell the wait LSN.
Thoughts?
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACUfS7LH1PaWmSZ5KwH4BpQxO9izeMw4qC3a1DAwi6nfbQ%40mail.gmail.com
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
