Re: Remove an unnecessary LSN calculation while validating WAL page header - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Remove an unnecessary LSN calculation while validating WAL page header
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACUU-q_uk+i9soRf7NkXk2Yh9fXnuqdOxo=gJocH40NM_A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove an unnecessary LSN calculation while validating WAL page header  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Remove an unnecessary LSN calculation while validating WAL page header
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 3:19 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:44 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> At Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:53:55 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote in
>> > It looks like we have an unnecessary XLogSegNoOffsetToRecPtr() in
>> > XLogReaderValidatePageHeader(). We pass the start LSN of the WAL page
>> > and check if it matches with the LSN that was stored in the WAL page
>> > header (xlp_pageaddr). We find segno, offset and LSN again using
>> > XLogSegNoOffsetToRecPtr(). This happens to be the same as the passed
>> > in LSN 'recptr'.
>>
>> Yeah, that's obviously useless. It looks like a thinko in pg93 when
>> recptr became to be directly passed from the caller instead of
>> calculating from static variables for file, segment and in-segment
>> offset.
>
>
> +1. This should be introduced in 7fcbf6a4 as a thinko. A grep search
> shows other callers of XLogSegNoOffsetToRecPtr have no such issue.

Thanks for reviewing. It's a pretty-old code that exists in 9.5 or
earlier [1], definitely not introduced by 7fcbf6a4.

[1] see XLogReaderValidatePageHeader() in
https://github.com/BRupireddy/postgres/blob/REL9_5_STABLE/src/backend/access/transam/xlogreader.c

-- 
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: create subscription - improved warning message
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db