Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bharath Rupireddy
Subject Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Date
Msg-id CALj2ACUOd9pWbGu2vJKCv8U1rfmPS9W8BqxwJ5KBM8BJWwKX0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/18/21, 8:27 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's the v4 patch with the above changes, the output looks like [1].
> > Please review it further.
>
> I agree with Tom.  I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
> attached) and call it a day.

Thanks. v5 patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?