On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 12:57 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:13:23 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 08:48:25AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > > So, a SQL function pg_dissect_walfile_name (or some other better name)
> > > given a WAL file name returns the tli and seg number. Then the
> > > pg_walfile_offset_lsn can just be a SQL-defined function (in
> > > system_functions.sql) using this new function and pg_settings. If this
> > > understanding is correct, it looks good to me at this point.
> >
> > I would do without the SQL function that looks at pg_settings, FWIW.
>
> If that function may be called at a high frequency, SQL-defined one is
> not suitable, but I don't think this function is used that way. With
> that premise, I would prefer SQL-defined as it is far simpler on its
> face.
>
> At Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:03:55 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> > Hence I would tend to let XLogFromFileName do the job, while having a
> > SQL function that is just a thin wrapper around it that returns the
> > segment TLI and its number, leaving the offset out of the equation as
> > well as this new XLogIdFromFileName().
>
> I don't think it could be problematic that the SQL-callable function
> returns a bogus result for a wrong WAL filename in the correct
> format. Specifically, I think that the function may return (0/0,0) for
> "000000000000000000000000" since that behavior is completely
> harmless. If we don't check logid, XLogFromFileName fits instead.
If we were to provide correctness and input invalidations
(specifically, the validations around 'seg', see below) of the WAL
file name typed in by the user, the function pg_walfile_offset_lsn()
wins the race.
+ XLogIdFromFileName(fname, &tli, &segno, &log, &seg, wal_segment_size);
+
+ if (seg >= XLogSegmentsPerXLogId(wal_segment_size) ||
+ (log == 0 && seg == 0) ||
+ segno == 0 ||
+ tli == 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
+ errmsg("invalid WAL file name \"%s\"", fname)));
+SELECT * FROM pg_walfile_offset_lsn('0000000100000000FFFFFFFF', 15);
+ERROR: invalid WAL file name "0000000100000000FFFFFFFF"
That said, I think we can have a single function
pg_dissect_walfile_name(wal_file_name, offset optional) returning
segno (XLogSegNo - physical log file sequence number), tli, lsn (if
offset is given). This way there is no need for another SQL-callable
function using pg_settings. Thoughts?
> (If we assume that the file names are typed in letter-by-letter, I
> rather prefer to allow lower-case letters:p)
It's easily doable if we convert the entered WAL file name to
uppercase using pg_toupper() and then pass it to IsXLogFileName().
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
