Re: procedure takes much more time than its query statement - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Crooke
Subject Re: procedure takes much more time than its query statement
Date
Msg-id CALi4UpgbqeeQmsidxV4bxJ=WjRrhHKGyS3csm2fwQqWuVDHT+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to procedure takes much more time than its query statement  (Sabin Coanda <s.coanda@deuromedia.com>)
List pgsql-performance

The most common reason for this (not specific to PG) is that the function is getting compiled without the substituted constants, and the query plan is generic, whereas with specific values it is able to use column statistics to pick a more efficient one.

On Nov 1, 2011 8:16 PM, "Sabin Coanda" <s.coanda@deuromedia.com> wrote:
Hi there,

I have the function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "Test"( ... )
RETURNS SETOF record AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
 RETURN QUERY
 SELECT ...;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' STABLE

The function call takes about 5 minute to proceed, but using directly its
query statement, after replacing the arguments with the same values, it
takes just 5 seconds !

I repeat the test several times and the duration is the same.

What is wrong ?

Please note Postgresql version is "PostgreSQL 8.3.5, compiled by Visual C++
build 1400". I used ANALYZE, and my query / function returns about 150 rows.
I made the tests in pgAdmin query windows.

TIA,
Sabin



--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Sabin Coanda
Date:
Subject: procedure takes much more time than its query statement
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: procedure takes much more time than its query statement