On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Korisk <Korisk@yandex.ru> wrote:
> -> Index Only Scan Backward using hashcheck_name_idx on public.hashcheck (cost=10000000000.00..10000398674.92
rows=25986792width=32)
It seems odd.
Is it possible to look at the non default configuration?
SELECT name, setting, reset_val FROM pg_settings WHERE setting <> reset_val;
> (actual time=0.104..3785.767 rows=25990002 loops=1)
> Output: name
> Heap Fetches: 0
> Total runtime: 7452.509 ms
> (6 rows)
>
> Благодаря шаманствам на:
> http://www.sql.ru/forum/actualthread.aspx?tid=974484
>
> 11.10.2012, 01:30, "Sergey Konoplev" <gray.ru@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Korisk <Korisk@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello! Is it possible to speed up the plan?
>>> Sort (cost=573977.88..573978.38 rows=200 width=32) (actual time=10351.280..10351.551 rows=4000 loops=1)
>>> Output: name, (count(name))
>>> Sort Key: hashcheck.name
>>> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 315kB
>>> -> HashAggregate (cost=573968.24..573970.24 rows=200 width=32) (actual time=10340.507..10341.288 rows=4000
loops=1)
>>> Output: name, count(name)
>>> -> Seq Scan on public.hashcheck (cost=0.00..447669.16 rows=25259816 width=32) (actual
time=0.019..2798.058rows=25259817 loops=1)
>>> Output: id, name, value
>>> Total runtime: 10351.989 ms
>>
>> AFAIU there are no query optimization solution for this.
>>
>> It may be worth to create a table hashcheck_stat (name, cnt) and
>> increment/decrement the cnt values with triggers if you need to get
>> counts fast.
>>
>> --
>> Sergey Konoplev
>>
>> a database and software architect
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
>>
>> Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +14158679984
--
Sergey Konoplev
a database and software architect
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +14158679984
