Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Sergey Konoplev
Subject Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages
Date
Msg-id CAL_0b1tVmywdzJn=yA2dBY0sEF--rcrBAfZGCco3yFQRQ9wLLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hot standby 9.2.6 -> 9.2.6 PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-20 12:01:55 -0800, Sergey Konoplev wrote:
>> For me it looks like something completely different from the
>> Tomonari's bug. I does not have problems with restarting and it always
>> has something to do with vacuum. The error message is the same every
>> time it breaks down:
>
> Well, you didn't mention that it wasn't related to restarts before. You
> said that you just had re-cloned the standby, so assuming a restart
> isn't unreasonable.

I tried to reproduce the Tomonari's bug after Heikki pointed me on it,
and nothing like described in those thread has happened.

>> Also, the issue is reproducible on the production site of a big
>> enterprise company and it is always a long lasting pain to negotiate
>> and deploy even a little patch. So I would like to ask you to review
>> this issue more carefully before I start the negotiation process,
>> please.
>
> I have to say, attitude-wise, I find that statement a bit
> problematic. You're working with the community here, not somebody you're
> paying.

Sure, I realize it. I am from the open-source world a little bit too.
Just wanted to make sure that everything that could be done is done.
Sorry if I said something wrong.

--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA

http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray.ru@gmail.com

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate key violates unique constraint