On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, David G Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> query | BEGIN;
>> SET LOCAL statement_timeout TO 1000;
>> DROP INDEX public.idx1;
>> ALTER INDEX public.idx2 RENAME TO idx1;
>> END;
>
> If I read this correctly you sent the entire begin...end as a single
> compound statement and so, depending on how you did this, the actual SET
> LOCAL command never got executed since the entire command is waiting for the
> necessary locks before it can be executed.
Right, I send it as a single command.
> Your sample test doesn't appear to correctly exercise this behavior. Are
> you maybe using -c in the problem case? Or a client library besides psql
> that would behave in this manner?
In this case I use DBD::Pg, but I haven't found any notes about such
kind of behavior.
> Note that the fact that "query" is a compound statement is why I claim the
> above...
So, If I separate the commands everything will will work as expected, correct?
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/statement-timeout-doesn-t-work-tp5811704p5812037.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
+1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (499) 346-7196, +7 (988) 888-1979
gray.ru@gmail.com
