On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, now I understand. Also, looking at his "ls -l pg_xlog", I could
> find that modified timestamps of all those pre-allocated segments are
> about similar (around 12:10), whereas the latest modified time (15:37)
> is of segment 000000010000000E000000A7.
>
> Wonder if whatever configuration he is using is sub-optimal that these
> many WAL segments can be re-cycled upon a checkpoint? Or is this okay?
Is archive_mode=on?
What is archive_command?
Is the server in the recovery mode?
--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
Skype: gray-hemp
Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com
