Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 - master AND slave - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Sergey Konoplev
Subject Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 - master AND slave
Date
Msg-id CAL_0b1sW1dT5j1M5zt1KHK_31hQyO45hK1HVfLumQR5nC=9KjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 - master AND slave  (Wells Oliver <wellsoliver@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 - master AND slave  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-admin
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Wells Oliver <wellsoliver@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following up to my earlier post: I have a master and a slave server (using
> WAL), both 9.1. My 9.2 upgrade process is:
>
> 1) stop postgres on both servers
> 2) run pg_upgrade --link on both servers
> 3) change ports so 9.2 is on 5432, 9.1 on 5433
> 4) restart
>
> Is this the best way to do it and ensure that the WAL is still being created
> and the master/slave relationship properly maintained?

The problem is that after pg_upgrade the system catalog on the servers
wont match. Therefore you need to rebuild your slave from scratch.

There were some ideas around rsync [1], however, nobody proved that
they work appropriately.

[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20120320204916.GB26163@momjian.us


--
Kind regards,
Sergey Konoplev
PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA

Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp
Phone: USA +1 (415) 867-9984, Russia +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979
Skype: gray-hemp
Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Vincent Lau
Date:
Subject: Re: 0-byte 2PC File
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: Creating new cluster by copying directory?