Page and block can be used interchangeably, but the description of relpages in the documentation can be confusing to someone who doesn't care much about the difference between page and block.
When I want to count pages from a table, maybe the keywords I should look for should be "the number of", but the relpages is described by document with "Size of".
-----------------------------------------------
Shangzi Xie
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 3:16 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:25:52AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 9:40 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Yeah, we use "blocks" and "pages" interchangeably, which is something > > I don't feel a need to change; but evidently the OP didn't realize that. > > This is a job for the glossary, perhaps? > > I think that they're synonyms that can often (but not always) be used > interchangeably. I *think* that this understanding is shared by other > people, though I should check. Here goes: > > To me, "block" emphasizes on-disk/relfilenode storage. Something that > exists at a particular physical offset in a particular file (a > BlockNumber + relfilenode). On the other hand, the term "page" > emphasizes the in-memory format, and the indirection provided by the > bufpage.c slotted page format (i.e. line pointer array indirection).
Yes, I have heard the block-disk, page-memory explanation before.
