Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do?
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEHOrsAic+LVb-C5vN_NvUiKF9D=Wh5__=B6Q5wVNx3tYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do?  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
A different and more important issue (IMO) is that the xlog record
header currently only supports 32-bit xids -- long-running
transactions can reasonably see a xid4 wraparound in their lifetime.
You're completely right. This is a first of making xid's 64-bit proposed [1] i.e, making SLRU 64-bit [2]


--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Is monotonous xid8 is a right way to do?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Correct docs re: rewriting indexes when table rewrite is skipped