My 0.02 €: What I think does not matter much, what committers think is the way to pass something. However, I do not think that such an idea would pass a committer:-)
The same idea was the reason for my proposal to make automatic partitioning clauses to be in accordance with existing declarative syntax (even if it seems little bit long to write words "configuration (for values" )
CREATE TABLE foo(a int) PARTITION BY LIST(a) CONFIGURATION (FOR VALUES IN (1,2),(3,4) DEFAULT PARTITION foo_def); CREATE TABLE foo(a int) PARTITION BY HASH(a) CONFIGURATION (FOR VALUES WITH MODULUS 3); CREATE TABLE foo(a int) PARTITION BY RAGE(a) CONFIGURATION (FOR VALUES FROM 1 TO 1000 INTERVAL 10 DEFAULT PARTITION foo_def)
If we want generic (ident = value,...) then we need to introduce different to what is already committed for manual partitioning which I considered worse than my proposal above. Still other opinions are highly valued.
