Re: Pluggable toaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: Pluggable toaster
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEEdU5nuyVu1MhB=nRXtSk4CxH7pE7GTv0uwskXwK-MtgA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pluggable toaster  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: Pluggable toaster  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, hackers!

Maybe I've read the thread too superficially, but for me, it seems
like more of a discussion on what TOAST should NOT be. Maybe someone
more in the topic could explain what is the consensus on what we
require and what we like to to have in a new TOAST?

For me, a good toast should be chunk-updatable, so that we don't need
to rewrite the whole TOAST and WAL-replicate the whole thing at every
small attribute modification. But obviously, it's just another
opinion.

Kind regards,
Pavel Borisov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible