Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEEAh52FLzMWAWFvtnvZECaH+idd8Mkh9sdsE5XD7NYZyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 19:13, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> writes:
> I see Aleksander worked on this patch (with many other hackers) and marked
> it as rejected. And now Evgeniy, a new developer wants to continue and
> rebase this patch and also the patches in another 64-xid thread
> disregarding the fact that the patch is rejected. It's not a crime. It's
> rejected, true.

No, but it's a waste of time.  Just rebasing the patch does nothing to
counter the arguments that made us reject it before.
 
Tom, I agree! Just wrote this because of probable confusion of names by Wenhui above.

Regards,
Pavel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support Int64 GUCs
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for unsigned integer types