Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Borisov
Subject Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Date
Msg-id CALT9ZEE3jHRk4be3bq6swsUimU9OKVPBJdq49Z2RkXSwVthHEQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators  (Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>)
Responses Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
List pgsql-hackers
 
The subject is about the documentation, but the post reveals
inconsistencies of the operators.  Tom Lane fixed the documentation on
the back branches.  The new patch is to fix the operators on the
master only.

Nice catch, thanks!
I agree that different operators should not have the same name and I'm planning to review the patch soon. What are your ideas on the possibility to backpatch it also? It seems a little bit weird that the operator can change its name between versions of PG. 
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Split copy.c
Next
From: Jakub Wartak
Date:
Subject: Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message