Re: BUG #15900: `executor could not find named tuplestore` intriggers with transition table and row locks - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Александр Акципетров
Subject Re: BUG #15900: `executor could not find named tuplestore` intriggers with transition table and row locks
Date
Msg-id CALPsoAJN=Z8sR8c0d2CGkCWVyV9-Q3X0mciHsWcvBzWbCGreLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #15900: `executor could not find named tuplestore` in triggers with transition table and row locks  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 01:22, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      15900
Logged by:          Alex Aktsipetrov
Email address:      alex.akts@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 12beta2
Operating system:   Ubuntu 16.04
Description:       

SELECT FOR UPDATE query that references a transition table in AFTER
INSERT/UPDATE triggers produces an unexpected error. The same query with FOR
UPDATE omitted finishes without any error, which is my expectation for the
original one as well. AFTER DELETE triggers were not tested.

For example, the following query:

        create table testtr (a int, b text);

        create function testtr_trigger() returns trigger language plpgsql as
        $$begin
         perform(
           select array_agg(a) from
           (select testtr.a from testtr join new_table on testtr.a = new_table.a
for update)
           as tmp
         );
         return new;
        end$$;

        create trigger testtr_trigger
        after insert on testtr
        referencing new table as new_table
        for each statement execute procedure testtr_trigger();

        insert into testtr values (1, 'one'), (2, 'two');

produces the following error:

        ERROR:  executor could not find named tuplestore "new_table"
        CONTEXT:  SQL statement "SELECT (
           select array_agg(a) from
           (select testtr.a from testtr join new_table on testtr.a = new_table.a
for update)
           as tmp
        )"

I think the issue was introduced in ad0bda5d24ea2bcc72b5e50020e3c79bab10836b
as the query finishes successfully in its ancestor.




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15900: `executor could not find named tuplestore` in triggers with transition table and row locks
Next
From: Alex Aktsipetrov
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15900: `executor could not find named tuplestore` intriggers with transition table and row locks