On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 04:43, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com> wrote: > I noticed that the dummy relation is skipped in the loop over rel->live_parts. > I wonder if the following change is sensible.
I made the definition of live_parts to be partitions that survived partition pruning. There's a few reasons why a RELOPT_BASEREL could have dummy rels in its live_parts Bitmapset, so I don't see why we should make an exception and remove them from RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL.
If you think we should change the definition of what live_parts is, then you'd need to come up with a patch that did it for everything.
However, I don't really think I'm for changing that. We currently set live_parts for RELOPT_BASEREL just after we perform partition pruning, so we could well have many bits set in that field for relations that will become dummy rels later. At what point could code looking at the live_parts field know that the bits that are set are never dummy rels? Or would they always just have to check for dummy rels just in case the bits are not unset for the dummy rels yet? Seems a bit messy to me.
