Re: support for MERGE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zhihong Yu
Subject Re: support for MERGE
Date
Msg-id CALNJ-vSjsyxagT2SdXsiAjd_L55x+RfT9iBavGVTpprSaxkQ-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: support for MERGE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 4:43 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
Apologies, there was a merge failure and I failed to notice.  Here's the
correct patch.

(This is also in github.com/alvherre/postgres/tree/merge-15)

Hi,
For v6-0001-MERGE-SQL-Command-following-SQL-2016.patch :

+    * Either we were dealing with a NOT MATCHED tuple or
+    * ExecMergeNotMatched() returned "false", indicating the previously

I think there was a typo above: ExecMergeMatched() returned "false" 
because ExecMergeMatched() is called above the comment.

Cheers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression (part 2)
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication