Re: Partitioning options - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Justin
Subject Re: Partitioning options
Date
Msg-id CALL-XeOc48E8t=8kgAZ3ANfJibBYPR5ifBoh9MtQG0i1KyedsA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning options  (Alec Lazarescu <alecl@alecl.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioning options  (Alec Lazarescu <alecl@alecl.com>)
List pgsql-general

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 5:20 PM Alec Lazarescu <alecl@alecl.com> wrote:
"Would probably look at a nested partitioning"

I'm not the original poster, but I have a schema with nested
(composite) partitions and I do run into some significant
inefficiencies compared to flat partitions in various schema metadata
operations (queries to get the list of tables, creating foreign keys,
etc.) in tables with 1,000+ total partitions.

One example: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAE%2BE%3DSQacy6t_3XzCWnY1eiRcNWfz4pp02FER0N7mU_F%2Bo8G_Q%40mail.gmail.com

Alec



Hi Alec, 

would need to see the DDL of the partitions and the queries accessing these partitions to have an opinion   

Thank you
Justin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Mat Views and Conflicts
Next
From: sud
Date:
Subject: Question on Table creation