Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Reykja
Subject Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Date
Msg-id CALDgxVtv9KtrfwRV5pnSxGa-9R6MpUJAoTKHGjHFys3hCqSZYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows  ("P. Christeas" <xrg@linux.gr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ams@2ndquadrant.com"
target="_blank">ams@2ndquadrant.com</a>></span>wrote:<br /><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:00 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">At 2012-10-21 11:49:26 -0400, <a
href="mailto:cbbrowne@gmail.com">cbbrowne@gmail.com</a>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > If there is a natural sequence
(e.g.- a value assigned by nextval()),<br /> > that offers a natural place to apply the usual order-imposing ORDER
BY<br/> > that we are expected to use elsewhere.<br /><br /></div>Note: "INSERT … RETURNING" doesn't accept an ORDER
BYclause.<br /></blockquote></div><br />Would anyone be opposed to somebody - say, me - writing a patch to allow that? 
Itwould take me a lot longer than an experienced hacker to do it, but I'm willing to try.<br />

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Next
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility