On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 at 08:24, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> The patches here aren't fully polished (as will be evident). But they should
> be more than good enough to discuss whether this is a sane direction.
The patch does not apply on top of HEAD as in [1], please post a rebased patch:
=== Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
f2857af485a00ab5dbfa2c83af9d83afe4378239 ===
=== applying patch
./v1-0001-wip-lwlock-fix-quadratic-behaviour-with-very-long.patch
patching file src/include/storage/proc.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 217.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/include/storage/proc.h.rej
patching file src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 988 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1047.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1076.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1104.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1117.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1141.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1775.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1790.
7 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c.rej
[1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_41_3993.log
Regards,
Vignesh
