On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 18:10, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>
> Hmm, this problem isn't limited to this one pg_upgrade test, right? It
> could happen with any pg_upgrade invocation. And perhaps in a running
> server too, if a relfilenumber is reused quickly. In dropdb() and
> DropTableSpace() we do this:
>
> WaitForProcSignalBarrier(EmitProcSignalBarrier(PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE));
>
> Should we do the same here? Not sure where exactly to put that; perhaps
> in mdcreate(), if the creation fails with STATUS_DELETE_PENDING.
How about a patch similar to the attached one? I have run pg_upgrade
tests multiple times, but unfortunately, I was unable to reproduce the
issue or verify these changes.
Regards,
Vignesh
