Re: Logical replication timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Logical replication timeout
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm2eWmtcr-v9Q-AuhM66capAp0w758PTtfwmUWdSOq6Jvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Logical replication timeout  (RECHTÉ Marc <marc.rechte@meteo.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 13:55, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Marc,
>
> > Thanks again for this new patch.
> >
> > Unfortunately it does not compile (17.2 source):
>
> Right, because of the reason I posted [1].
>
> I updated the patch which did the same approach. It could pass my CI.

Let's conduct some performance tests with varying numbers of spill
files (e.g., small ones like 1, 5, and 10, and larger ones like 100,
1000, and 10,000) along with different levels of concurrent
transactions. We can then compare the results with the current HEAD.

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: corrupt MVNDistinct entry